College Tour Warns of Global Warming Threat
By Jim Bertel Washington25 April 2007

Watch Sheryl Crow Global Warming / Real broadband - download Watch Sheryl Crow Global Warming / Real broadband Watch Sheryl Crow Global Warming / Real dialup - download Watch Sheryl Crow Global Warming / Real dialup
The release last year of former Vice President Al Gore's award-winning film "An Inconvenient Truth" has turned global warming into a hot topic of concern in the United States. One of the film's producers, Laurie David, has become a leading advocate for environmental issues. David and singer-songwriter Sheryl Crow have just completed a two-week U.S. tour, raising the alarm about global warming with their music and their message. VOA's Jim Bertel had a chance to sit down with the two activists to talk about their "Stop Global Warming College Tour."
Sheryl Crow and Laurie David during their concert tour stop in Washington, D.C.
Change. That was the message of the "Stop Global Warming College Tour." Grammy Award-winning musician Sheryl Crow and Laurie David, a producer of the Oscar-winning environmental film "An Inconvenient Truth," headlined the tour, aimed at inspiring college students to make a personal change to stop global warming.
In an interview with VOA, Sheryl Crow said the two environmental activists hatched the tour idea over lunch while discussing how they could make a difference.
Sheryl Crow
Crow told us, "My answer to everything is let's get a bus, so we got a biodiesel bus [a bus fueled by vegetable oil], and Laurie had the excellent idea of going to college campuses -- because, as we all know, throughout history the greatest social changes, I believe, have started at the college level."
The 90-minute shows were a mix of Crow's music and David's environmental message.
"The environment is a beautiful spring day,” explains David. “It is a shady tree, it's the air you breathe and the water you drink. And the environmentalism is the protection of those basic things. That's the accurate definition. And that makes us all environmentalists who still face the most urgent challenge of our lifetime -- global warming."
Laurie David
Scientists say carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles, factories and power plants cause global warming, and if efforts to curb this man-made environmental hazard do not increase soon, the results could be disastrous for the planet.
University of Maryland student Andrew Nazdin believes college students have an important role to play in saving the environment. "I see global warming as the threat to my generation. It's the defining challenge of my generation. If we don't step up and solve this climate crisis, my college degree, everything I worked for so far is not really going to be worth anything, because I am going to be living in such a dramatically altered world."
For many, the problem seems too big to make a personal difference. But David says cutting carbon emissions starts at home, by using energy-efficient light bulbs and appliances. She also says individuals can be the catalyst for change in government policy.
"People. Government doesn't change until people demand it. People have to demand it. And that is one of the reasons we are out here trying to ignite this movement. It is not going to happen until people demand it," says David.
The 11-city tour wrapped up on Earth Day (April 22) with a large show in Washington. But the effort to bring about environmental change continues online, with a virtual march on Washington at stopglobalwarming.org.
"Instead of marching for just one day, let's march every single day until we are a million strong,” suggests David. “And we want to count every single person who says, 'I demand solutions now to global warming.' And we started with one marcher, and now we're getting close to a million."
"And what everyone has to know is that this is not a political issue,” adds Crow. “This is a human-rights issue, and we have to demand change. And the way change happens is for the movement to become so loud they can't block it out."
More than 700,000 people have enrolled in the "virtual march" so far. Crow and David promise the campaign will continue until the number of marchers is great enough to make government leaders realize the time to address the global warming crisis is now.
http://www.voanews.com/english/

give the carbon tax higher

Carbon Tax Best Way to Set Price of Carbon
In order to get on with major reductions in carbon dioxide emissions, within both a still functional biosphere and viable capitalistic system, the price of emitting carbon must be set -- and quickly and accurately. There are two primary methods of doing so - the establishment of carbon markets [search] and the levying of carbon taxes [search]. The conservative newspaper Financial Times favors carbon taxes, as does Ecological Internet within our Lincoln Plan carbon tax campaign, and today ran an interesting series of articles which essentially find a carbon tax to be easier and more effective in pricing carbon. A recent report likens the individual market in carbon credits to "Offsetting Indulgences for your Climate Sins". The Financial Times was equally skeptical, as their investigation of carbon credit trading concludes: "Companies and individuals rushing to go green have been spending millions on 'carbon credit' projects that yield few if any environmental benefits." They found some carbon reductions paid for in carbon offset schemes are never carried out, and others would have been made anyway. The European carbon market which has been in existence the longest and is most established has given out so many carbon credits that very little reductions in emissions were necessary by industry. Ecological Internet supports a global carbon market that is well regulated, but not as a replacement for carbon taxes, which we are convinced will address the issue of pricing carbon more quickly, effectively and simply. We concur that "while short-term politics favour markets, taxes would be better in the long term because industry needs certainty for investments... A government committing to painful taxes signals the seriousness of its intentions..."
comments (0) search
Climate Change Threatens Global Security
Even as the Bush government continues its criminal climate change obstruction [search], yet another U.S. institution has entered the fray regarding the seriousness of dramatically reducing carbon emissions to mitigate against the worst possible impacts of sudden or abrupt climate change. This time is is eleven former high-ranking U.S. military and international security issue specialists warning that "climate change threatens to prolong the war on terrorism and foster political instability that some governments will be unable to cope with... it has the potential to create sustained natural and humanitarian disasters on a scale far beyond those we see today." In the United States this is likely to play itself out with severe fluctuations in water from drought to flooding. These are the sort of fighting words of apocalyptic warning that have gotten me in trouble for years in my personal writings. Through its disruption of ecological systems, economies and societies; climate change has the potential to gravely impact international security [search]. This is why on the spurring of the UK, climate change will shortly be taken up by the Security Council of the United Nation. People from Al Gore to Military personnel can see the threat to our very being, yet from 1990-2005 U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Up 16%. What a myopic, slovenly country that can know all the implications of inaction, studying them with weekly new reports of ever more detail and certainly, and yet fail so utterly to make the changes in energy sources, conservation and efficiency necessary to avert global crisis. Yet a nascent protest movement is emerging in the U.S. [more] that by taking to the streets just may be enough to stop the U.S. from hindering efforts to save the Planet.

from : http://www.climateark.org/

Globar warming meaning is ...

Global warming
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Global mean surface temperature anomaly 1850 to 2006

Mean surface temperature anomalies during the period 1995 to 2004 with respect to the average temperatures from 1940 to 1980
Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of the Earth's near-surface air and oceans in recent decades and its projected continuation.
Global average air temperature near the Earth's surface rose 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.3 ± 0.32 °F) during the past century. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes, "most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations,"[1] which leads to warming of the surface and lower atmosphere by increasing the greenhouse effect. Other phenomena such as solar variation and volcanoes have probably had a warming effect from pre-industrial times to 1950, but a cooling effect since 1950.[1] These conclusions have been endorsed by at least 30 scientific societies and academies of science, including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists is the only scientific society that rejects these conclusions,[2][3] and a few individual scientists also disagree with parts of them.[4]
Climate models referenced by the IPCC predict that global surface temperatures are likely to increase by 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F) between 1990 and 2100.[1] The range of values reflects the use of differing scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions as well as uncertainties regarding climate sensitivity. Although most studies focus on the period up to 2100, warming and sea level rise are expected to continue for more than a millennium even if no further greenhouse gases are released after this date.[1] This reflects the long average atmospheric lifetime of carbon dioxide (CO2).
An increase in global temperatures can in turn cause other changes, including sea level rise, and changes in the amount and pattern of precipitation. There may also be increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, though it is difficult to connect specific events to global warming. Other consequences may include changes in agricultural yields, glacier retreat, reduced summer streamflows, species extinctions and increases in the ranges of disease vectors.
Remaining scientific uncertainties include the exact degree of climate change expected in the future, especially how changes will vary from region to region around the globe. There is ongoing political and public debate regarding what, if any, action should be taken to reduce or reverse future warming or to adapt to its expected consequences. Most national governments have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol aimed at combating greenhouse gas emissions.
Contents[hide]
1 Terminology
2 Causes
2.1 Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere
2.2 Feedbacks
2.3 Solar variation
3 History
3.1 From the present to the dawn of human settlement
3.2 Pre-human climate variations
4 Climate models
5 Attributed and expected effects
5.1 Economics
6 Mitigation, adaptation, and the Kyoto Protocol
7 Controversy and politics
8 Related issues
8.1 Ocean acidification
8.2 Global dimming
8.3 Ozone
9 References
10 Further reading
11 See also
12 External links
12.1 Scientific
12.2 Educational
12.3 Other
//

Terminology
The term global warming is a specific example of the broader term climate change, which can also refer to global cooling. In principle, global warming is neutral as to the period or causes, but in both common and scientific usage the term generally refers to recent warming and implies a human influence.[5] The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) uses the term "climate change" for human-caused change, and "climate variability" for other changes.[6] The term "anthropogenic climate change" is sometimes used when focusing on human-induced changes.

Causes
Main articles: Attribution of recent climate change and scientific opinion on climate change

Carbon dioxide during the last 400,000 years and the rapid rise since the Industrial Revolution; changes in the Earth's orbit around the Sun, known as Milankovitch cycles, are believed to be the pacemaker of the 100,000 year ice age cycle.
The climate system varies through natural, internal processes and in response to variations in external forcing factors including solar activity, volcanic emissions, variations in the earth's orbit (orbital forcing) and greenhouse gases. The detailed causes of the recent warming remain an active field of research, but the scientific consensus[7][8] identifies increased levels of greenhouse gases due to human activity as the main influence. This attribution is clearest for the most recent 50 years, for which the most detailed data are available. Contrasting with this view, other hypotheses have been proposed to explain some of the observed increase in global temperatures, including: the warming is within the range of natural variation; the warming is a consequence of coming out of a prior cool period, namely the Little Ice Age; or the warming is primarily a result of variances in solar radiation.
None of the effects of forcing are instantaneous. Due to the thermal inertia of the Earth's oceans and slow responses of other indirect effects, the Earth's current climate is not in equilibrium with the forcing imposed. Climate commitment studies indicate that, even if greenhouse gases were stabilized at present day levels, a further warming of about 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) would still occur.[9]

Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere
Main article: Greenhouse effect

Recent increases in atmospheric CO2. The monthly CO2 measurements display small seasonal oscillations in an overall yearly uptrend; each year's maximum is reached during the northern hemisphere's late spring, and declines during the northern hemisphere growing season as plants remove some CO2 from the atmosphere.
The greenhouse effect was discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1824 and was first investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. It is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by atmospheric gases warms a planet's atmosphere and surface.
Greenhouse gases create a natural greenhouse effect without which mean temperatures on Earth would be an estimated 33 °C (59 °F) lower, so that Earth would be uninhabitable.[10] It is therefore not correct to say that there is a debate between those who "believe in" and "oppose" the greenhouse effect as such. Rather, the debate concerns the net effect of the addition of greenhouse gases while allowing for associated positive and negative feedback mechanisms.
On Earth, the major natural greenhouse gases are water vapor, which causes about 36–70% of the greenhouse effect (not including clouds); carbon dioxide (CO2), which causes 9–26%; methane (CH4), which causes 4–9%; and ozone, which causes 3–7%. The atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and CH4 have increased by 31% and 149% respectively above pre-industrial levels since 1750. This is considerably higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years, the period for which reliable data has been extracted from ice cores. From less direct geological evidence it is believed that CO2 values this high were last attained 20 million years ago.[11] "About three-quarters of the anthropogenic [man-made] emissions of CO2 to the atmosphere during the past 20 years are due to fossil fuel burning. The rest of the anthropogenic emissions are predominantly due to land-use change, especially deforestation."[12]
The present atmospheric concentration of CO2 is about 383 parts per million (ppm) by volume.[13] Future CO2 levels are expected to rise due to ongoing burning of fossil fuels and land-use change. The rate of rise will depend on uncertain economic, sociological, technological, natural developments, but may be ultimately limited by the availability of fossil fuels. The IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios gives a wide range of future CO2 scenarios, ranging from 541 to 970 ppm by the year 2100.[14] Fossil fuel reserves are sufficient to reach this level and continue emissions past 2100, if coal, tar sands or methane clathrates are extensively used.[15]
Positive feedback effects such as the expected release of CH4 from the melting of permafrost peat bogs in Siberia (possibly up to 70,000 million tonnes) may lead to significant additional sources of greenhouse gas emissions[16] not included in IPCC's climate models.[1]

Feedbacks
The effects of forcing agents on the climate are complicated by various feedback processes.
One of the most pronounced feedback effects relates to the evaporation of water. CO2 injected into the atmosphere causes a warming of the atmosphere and the earth's surface. The warming causes more water to be evaporated into the atmosphere. Since water vapor itself acts as a greenhouse gas, this causes still more warming; the warming causes more water vapor to be evaporated, and so forth until a new dynamic equilibrium concentration of water vapor is reached at a slightly higher humidity and with a much larger greenhouse effect than that due to CO2 alone.[17] This feedback effect is reversed only as the CO2 is slowly removed from the atmosphere.
Another important feedback process is ice-albedo feedback.[18] The increased CO2 in the atmosphere warms the Earth's surface and leads to melting of ice near the poles. As the ice melts, land or open water takes its place. Both land and open water are on average less reflective than ice, and thus absorb more solar radiation. This causes more warming, which in turn causes more melting, and this cycle continues.
Feedback effects due to clouds are an area of ongoing research and debate. Seen from below, clouds absorb infrared radiation and so exert a warming effect. Seen from above, the same clouds reflect sunlight and so exert a cooling effect. Increased global water vapor concentration may or may not cause an increase in global average cloud cover. The net effect of clouds thus has not been well modeled. Positive feedback due to release of CO2 and CH4 from thawing permafrost is an additional mechanism contributing to warming. Possible positive feedback due to CH4 release from melting seabed ices is a further mechanism to be considered.

Solar variation

Solar variation over the last 30 years
Main article: Solar variation
Variations in solar output, possibly amplified by cloud feedbacks, have been suggested as a possible cause of recent warming.[19] A difference between this mechanism and greenhouse warming is that an increase in solar activity should produce a warming of the stratosphere while greenhouse warming should produce a cooling of the stratosphere. Stratospheric warming has not been observed.[20]
Combined solar variation and volcanoes have probably had a warming effect from pre-industrial times to 1950, but a cooling effect since 1950.[1] Some research has suggested that the Sun's contribution may have been underestimated. Researchers at Duke University have estimated that the Sun may have minimally contributed about 10–30% of the global surface temperature warming over the period 1980–2002.[21] Similarly, Stott et al. estimate in 2003 that climate models overestimate the relative effect of greenhouse gases compared to solar forcing but also that the cooling effect of volcanic dust and sulfate aerosols has been underestimated.[22] They conclude that even with an enhanced climate sensitivity to solar forcing, most of the warming during the latest decades is attributable to the increases in greenhouse gases.

History
Main article: Temperature record

Curves of reconstructed temperature at two locations in Antarctica and a global record of variations in glacial ice volume. Today's date is on the left side of the graph

From the present to the dawn of human settlement
Global temperatures on both land and sea have increased by 0.75 °C (1.4 °F) relative to the period 1860–1900, according to the instrumental temperature record. This measured temperature increase is not significantly affected by the urban heat island. Since 1979, land temperatures have increased about twice as fast as ocean temperatures (0.25 °C/decade against 0.13 °C/decade).[23] Temperatures in the lower troposphere have increased between 0.12 and 0.22 °C (0.22 and 0.4 °F) per decade since 1979, according to satellite temperature measurements. Temperature is believed to have been relatively stable over the one or two thousand years before 1850, with possibly regional fluctuations such as the Medieval Warm Period or the Little Ice Age.
Based on estimates by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2005 was the warmest year since reliable, widespread instrumental measurements became available in the late 1800s, exceeding the previous record set in 1998 by a few hundredths of a degree.[24] Estimates prepared by the World Meteorological Organization and the Climatic Research Unit concluded that 2005 was the second warmest year, behind 1998.[25][26]
Anthropogenic emissions of other pollutants—notably sulfate aerosols—can exert a cooling effect by increasing the reflection of incoming sunlight. This partially accounts for the cooling seen in the temperature record in the middle of the twentieth century,[27] though the cooling may also be due in part to natural variability.

Two millennia of mean surface temperatures according to different reconstructions, each smoothed on a decadal scale. The unsmoothed, annual value for 2004 is also plotted for reference.
Paleoclimatologist William Ruddiman has argued that human influence on the global climate began around 8,000 years ago with the start of forest clearing to provide land for agriculture and 5,000 years ago with the start of Asian rice irrigation.[28] Ruddiman's interpretation of the historical record, with respect to the methane data, has been disputed.[29]

Pre-human climate variations
Further information: Paleoclimatology
See also: Snowball Earth
Earth has experienced warming and cooling many times in the past. The recent Antarctic EPICA ice core spans 800,000 years, including eight glacial cycles timed by orbital variations with interglacial warm periods comparable to present temperatures.[30]
A rapid buildup of greenhouse gases caused warming in the early Jurassic period (about 180 million years ago), with average temperatures rising by 5 °C (9.0 °F). Research by the Open University indicates that the warming caused the rate of rock weathering to increase by 400%. As such weathering locks away carbon in calcite and dolomite, CO2 levels dropped back to normal over roughly the next 150,000 years.[31][32]
Sudden releases of methane from clathrate compounds (the clathrate gun hypothesis) have been hypothesized as a cause for other warming events in the distant past, including the Permian-Triassic extinction event (about 251 million years ago) and the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (about 55 million years ago).

Climate models
Main article: Global climate model

Calculations of global warming prepared in or before 2001 from a range of climate models under the SRES A2 emissions scenario, which assumes no action is taken to reduce emissions.

The geographic distribution of surface warming during the 21st century calculated by the HadCM3 climate model if a business as usual scenario is assumed for economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions. In this figure, the globally averaged warming corresponds to 3.0 °C (5.4 °F)
Scientists have studied global warming with computer models of the climate. These models are based on physical principles of fluid dynamics, radiative transfer, and other processes, with some simplifications being necessary because of limitations in computer power. These models predict that the net effect of adding greenhouse gases is to produce a warmer climate. However, even when the same assumptions of fossil fuel consumption and CO2 emission are used, the amount of predicted warming varies between models and there still remains a considerable range of climate sensitivity.
Including uncertainties in the models and in future greenhouse gas concentrations, the IPCC anticipates a warming of 1.1 °C to 6.4 °C (2.0 °F to 11.5 °F) between 1990 and 2100. Models have also been used to help investigate the causes of recent climate change by comparing the observed changes to those that the models predict from various natural and human derived causes.
Climate models can produce a good match to observations of global temperature changes over the last century.[33] These models do not unambiguously attribute the warming that occurred from approximately 1910 to 1945 to either natural variation or human effects; however, they suggest that the warming since 1975 is dominated by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
Most global climate models, when run to predict future climate, are forced by imposed greenhouse gas scenarios, generally one from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). Less commonly, models may be run by adding a simulation of the carbon cycle; this generally shows a positive feedback, though this response is uncertain (under the A2 SRES scenario, responses vary between an extra 20 and 200 ppm of CO2). Some observational studies also show a positive feedback.[34]
The representation of clouds is one of the main sources of uncertainty in present-generation models, though progress is being made on this problem.[35] There is also an ongoing discussion as to whether climate models are neglecting important indirect and feedback effects of solar variability.

Attributed and expected effects
Main article: Effects of global warming

Global glacial mass balance in the last 50 years, reported to the WGMS and the NSIDC. The increased downward trend in the late 1980s is symptomatic of the increased rate and number of retreating glaciers.
Some effects on both the natural environment and human life are, at least in part, already being attributed to global warming. A 2001 report by the IPCC suggests that glacier retreat, ice shelf disruption such as the Larsen Ice Shelf, sea level rise, changes in rainfall patterns, increased intensity and frequency of extreme weather events, are being attributed in part to global warming.[36] While changes are expected for overall patterns, intensity, and frequencies, it is difficult to attribute specific events to global warming. Other expected effects include water scarcity, changes in mountain snowpack, adverse health effects from warmer temperatures, and the spread of disease.
Increased losses resulting from extreme weather are primarily due to an increase in population, and are partly due to increasing severe weather.[37] A summary of probable effects and recent understanding can be found in the report of the IPCC Working Group II;[36] the newer IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summary reports, "There is observational evidence for an increase of intense tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic since about 1970, correlated with increases of tropical sea surface temperatures. There are also suggestions of increased intense tropical cyclone activity in some other regions where concerns over data quality are greater. Multi-decadal variability and the quality of the tropical cyclone records prior to routine satellite observations in about 1970 complicate the detection of long-term trends in tropical cyclone activity. There is no clear trend in the annual numbers of tropical cyclones."[1]
Additional anticipated effects include sea level rise of 110 to 770 mm (0.36 to 2.5 feet) by 2100,[38] repercussions to agriculture, possible slowing of the thermohaline circulation, reductions in the ozone layer, increased intensity and frequency of hurricanes and extreme weather events, lowering of ocean pH, and the spread of diseases such as malaria and dengue fever. One study predicts 18% to 35% of a sample of 1,103 animal and plant species would be extinct by 2050, based on future climate projections.[39] Mechanistic studies have documented extinctions due to recent climate change: McLaughlin et al. documented two populations of Bay checkerspot butterfly being threatened by precipitation change.[40] Parmesan stated, "Few studies have been conducted at a scale that encompasses an entire species"[41] and also in 2002 McLaughlin et al. agreed "few mechanistic studies have linked extinctions to recent climate change."[40]

Economics
Main article: Economics of global warming
Some economists have tried to estimate the aggregate net economic costs of damages from climate change across the globe (the social cost of carbon (SCC)). Such estimates have so far failed to reach conclusive findings; in a survey of 100 estimates, the values ran from US$10 per tonne of carbon (tC) (US$3 per tonne of carbon dioxide) up to US$350/tC (US$95 per tonne of carbon dioxide), with a mean of US$43 per tonne of carbon (US$12 per tonne of carbon dioxide).[42]

Mitigation, adaptation, and the Kyoto Protocol
Main articles: Mitigation of global warming, adaptation to global warming, and Kyoto Protocol
The broad agreement among climate scientists that global temperatures will continue to increase has led nations, states, corporations and individuals to implement actions to try to curtail global warming or adjust to it. Many environmental groups encourage individual action against global warming, often aimed at the consumer, and there has been business action on climate change. The world's primary international agreement on combating global warming is the Kyoto Protocol, an amendment to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Controversy and politics
Main articles: Global warming controversy and Politics of global warming
The scientific findings surrounding global warming have led to the involvement of politicians, energy industry funding of critics and skeptical politicians, participation by environmental groups, and active discussions by pundit and media personalities over the cause, effects, and mitigations. Governments have taken stances, often widely divergent at national and local levels. U.S. officials, such as Philip Cooney, have repeatedly edited scientific reports from U.S. government scientists,[43] many of whom, such as Thomas Knutson, have been ordered to refrain from discussing climate change and related topics.[44][45][46] Fossil fuel companies have spent large sums of money for public relations to downplay its importance.[1] Environmental groups have launched far-reaching campaigns.

Related issues

Ocean acidification
Main article: Ocean acidification
Increased atmospheric CO2 increases the amount of CO2 dissolved in the oceans.[47] Carbon dioxide gas dissolved in the ocean reacts with water to form carbonic acid resulting in ocean acidification. Ocean surface pH is estimated to have decreased from approximately 8.25 to 8.14 since the beginning of the industrial era,[48] and it is estimated that it will drop by a further 0.3 to 0.4 units by 2100 as the ocean absorbs more anthropogenic CO2.[49] Since organisms and ecosystems are adapted to a narrow range of pH, this is a serious concern directly driven by increased atmospheric CO2.

Global dimming
Main article: Global dimming
Scientists have stated with 66–90% confidence that the effects of volcanic and human-caused aerosols have offset some of global warming, and that greenhouse gases would have resulted in more warming than observed if not for this effect.[1]

Ozone
Main article: Ozone depletion
Although global warming and ozone depletion often are linked in the media, the relationship between the two is not strong.

References
^ a b c d e f g h Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis - Summary for Policymakers (PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Retrieved on 2007-02-02.
^ American Quaternary Association (5 September 2006). "Petroleum Geologists‘ Award to Novelist Crichton Is Inappropriate" (pdf). Eos 87: 364. “[AAPG] stands alone among scientific societies in its denial of human-induced effects on global warming.”
^ Climate Change Policy (cfm). American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Retrieved on 2007-03-30.
^ American Quaternary Association (5 September 2006). "Petroleum Geologists‘ Award to Novelist Crichton Is Inappropriate" (pdf). Eos 87: 364. “Few credible scientists now doubt that humans have influenced the documented rise in global temperatures since the Industrial Revolution.”
^ Climate Change: Basic Information. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved on 2007-02-09.
^ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Article I. United Nations. Retrieved on 2007-01-15.
^ Joint science academies’ statement: The science of climate change. Royal Society (May 17, 2001). Retrieved on 2007-04-01. “The work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) represents the consensus of the international scientific community on climate change science”
^ Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change. Royal Society (June 2005). Retrieved on 2007-04-01. “We recognise the international scientific consensus of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)”
^ Gerald A. Meehl, et.al., "How Much More Global Warming and Sea Level Rise?" Science Magazine, 18 March 2005. Retrieved February 11, 2007.
^ (December 2002). "Living with Climate Change - An Overview of Potential Climate Change Impacts on Australia" (PDF). Australian Greenhouse Office. Retrieved on 2007-04-18.
^ Pearson, Paul N.; Palmer, Martin R. (2000). "Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years". Nature 406 (6797).
^ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis, Part 6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001]). Retrieved on 2007-01-18.
^ Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide - Mauna Loa.
^ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis, 3.7.3.3 SRES scenarios and their implications for future CO2 concentration
^ IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios - 4.4.6. Resource Availability
^ Sample, Ian. "Warming Hits 'Tipping Point'", The Guardian, 2005-08-11. Retrieved on 2007-01-18.
^ Soden, Brian J.; Isacc M. Held (2005-11-01). "An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models". Journal of Climate 19 (14). Retrieved on 2007-04-21.
^ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis, 7.5.2 Sea Ice, 2001. Retrieved on February 11, 2007
^ Marsh, Nigel & Henrik Svensmark (2000), "Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate", Space Science Reviews 94 (1-2): 215-230, DOI:10.1023/A:1026723423896. Retrieved on 2007-04-17
^ Haigh, Joanna D. (2003-01-15). "The effects of solar variability on the Earth's climate". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 361 (1802): 91-111. DOI:10.1098/rsta.2002.1111. Retrieved on 2007-03-15.
^ Scafetta, Nicola; West, Bruce J. (2005). "Estimated solar contribution to the global surface warming using the ACRIM TSI satellite composite" (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters 32. DOI:10.1029/2005GL023849.
^ Stott, Peter A.; Gareth S. Jones & John F. B. Mitchell (2003), "Do Models Underestimate the Solar Contribution to Recent Climate Change?", Journal of Climate 16 (24): 4079-4093, DOI:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016%3C4079:DMUTSC%3E2.0.CO;2. Retrieved on 2007-04-16
^ Smith, Thomas M.; Reynolds, Richard W. (2005-05-15). "A Global Merged Land–Air–Sea Surface Temperature Reconstruction Based on Historical Observations (1880–1997)" (PDF). Journal of climate 18 (12): 2021-2036. ISSN 0894-8755. Retrieved on 2007-03-14.
^ Goddard Institute for Space Studies, GISS Surface Temperature Analysis. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (2006-01-12). Retrieved on 2007-01-17.
^ The December Press Release 2005 (Word). Climactic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia (2005-12-15). Retrieved on 2007-04-13.
^ WMO STATEMENT ON THE STATUS OF THE GLOBAL CLIMATE IN 2005. World Meteorological Organization (2005-12-15). Retrieved on 2007-04-13.
^ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis, Chapter 12.4.3.3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). Retrieved on 2007-01-04.
^ William Ruddiman (March 2005). "How Did Humans First Alter Global Climate?" (PDF). March 2005 issue. Scientific American. Retrieved on 2007-03-05.
^ Schmidt, Gavin; Drew Shindell and Susan Harder (2004). "A note on the relationship between ice core methane concentrations and insolation". Geophysical Research Letters 31. DOI:10.1029/2004GL021083. ISSN 0094-8276. L23206. Retrieved on 2007-03-05.
^ Hansen, James; Makiko Sato & Reto Ruedy et al. (2006), "Global temperature change", PNAS 103 (39): 14288-14293. Retrieved on 2007-04-20
^ The Open University (January 30, 2004). The Open University Provides Answers on Global Warming (PDF). Press release. Retrieved on 2007-03-04.
^ Cohen, Anthony S.; Angela L. Coe; Stephen M. Harding; Lorenz Schwark (February 2004). "Osmium isotope evidence for the regulation of atmospheric CO2 by continental weathering" (HTML/PDF). Geology 32 (2): 157-160. DOI:0.1130/G20158.1. Retrieved on 2007-03-04.
^ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Work Group I Based upon Chapter 12, Figure 12.7 (2001). Retrieved on 2007-03-04.
^ Torn, Margaret; John Harte (2006-05-26). "Missing feedbacks, asymmetric uncertainties, and the underestimation of future warming". Geophysical Research Letters 33 (10). L10703. Retrieved on 2007-03-04.
^ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Work Group I Chapter 7.2.2 (2001). Retrieved on 2007-03-04.
^ a b Climate Change 2001: Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Retrieved on 2007-03-14.
^ Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report, Summary for Policymakers.
^ Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Retrieved on 2005-12-19.
^ Thomas, Chris D.; et al. (2004-01-08). "Extinction risk from climate change" (PDF). Nature 427: 145-138. DOI:10.1038/nature02121. Retrieved on 2007-03-18.
^ a b McLaughlin, John F.; et al. (2002-04-30). "Climate change hastens population extinctions" (PDF). PNAS 99 (9): 6070-6074. DOI:10.1073/pnas.052131199. Retrieved on 2007-03-29.
^ Permesan, Camille (2006-08-24). "Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change" (PDF). Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 637-669. DOI:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100. Retrieved on 2007-03-30.
^ 2007 IPCC Summary for Policymakers
^ Campbell, D. (June 20, 2003) "White House cuts global warming from report" Guardian Unlimited
^ Donaghy, T., et al. (2007) "Atmosphere of Pressure:" a report of the Government Accountability Project (Cambridge, Mass.: UCS Publications)
^ Rule, E. (2005) "Possible media attention" Email to NOAA staff, July 27. Obtained via FOIA request on July 31, 2006. and Teet, J. (2005) "DOC Interview Policy" Email to NOAA staff, September 29. Originally published by Alexandrovna, L. (2005) "Commerce Department tells National Weather Service media contacts must be pre-approved" The Raw Story, October 4. Accessed December 22, 2006
^ Zabarenko, D. (2007) "'Don't discuss polar bears:' memo to scientists" Reuters
^ The Ocean and the Carbon Cycle. NASA Oceanography (science@nasa) (2005-06-21). Retrieved on 2007-03-04.
^ Jacobson, M. Z. (2005). Studying ocean acidification with conservative, stable numerical schemes for nonequilibrium air-ocean exchange and ocean equilibrium chemistry. J. Geophys. Res. Atm. 110, D07302.
^ Orr, J. C. et al. (2005). Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437, 681-686.

Further reading
Amstrup, Steven C.; Ian Stirling, Tom S. Smith, Craig Perham, Gregory W. Thiemann (2006-04-27). "Recent observations of intraspecific predation and cannibalism among polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea" 29 (11): 997-1002. DOI:10.1007/s00300-006-0142-5.
Association of British Insurers (2005-06). Financial Risks of Climate Change.
Barnett, Tim P.; J. C. Adam, D. P. Lettenmaier (2005-11-17). "Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions". Nature 438 (7066): 303-309. DOI:10.1038/nature04141.
Behrenfeld, Michael J.; Robert T. O'Malley, David A. Siegel, Charles R. McClain, Jorge L. Sarmiento, Gene C. Feldman, Allen G. Milligan, Paul G. Falkowski, Ricardo M. Letelier, Emanuel S. Boss (2006-12-07). "Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity". Nature 444 (7120): 752-755.. DOI:10.1038/nature05317.
Choi, Onelack; Ann Fisher (2005-05). "The Impacts of Socioeconomic Development and Climate Change on Severe Weather Catastrophe Losses: Mid-Atlantic Region (MAR) and the U.S.". Climate Change 58: 149-170. DOI:10.1023/A:1023459216609.
Dyurgerov, Mark B.; Mark F. Meier (2005). Glaciers and the Changing Earth System: a 2004 Snapshot. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research Occasional Paper #58. ISSN 0069-6145.
Emanuel, Kerry A. (2005-08-04). "Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years.". Nature 436 (7051): 686-688. DOI:10.1038/nature03906.
Hansen, James; Larissa Nazarenko, Reto Ruedy, Makiko Sato, Josh Willis, Anthony Del Genio, Dorothy Koch, Andrew Lacis, Ken Lo, Surabi Menon, Tica Novakov, Judith Perlwitz, Gary Russell, Gavin A. Schmidt, Nicholas Tausnev (2005-06-03). "Earth's Energy Imbalance: Confirmation and Implications". Science 308 (5727): 1431-1435. DOI:10.1126/science.1110252.
Hinrichs, Kai-Uwe; Laura R. Hmelo, Sean P. Sylva (2003-02-21). "Molecular Fossil Record of Elevated Methane Levels in Late Pleistocene Coastal Waters". Science 299 (5610): 1214-1217. DOI:10.1126/science.1079601.
Hirsch, Time. "Plants revealed as methane source", BBC, 2006-01-11.
Hoyt, Douglas V.; Kenneth H. Schatten (1993-11). "A discussion of plausible solar irradiance variations, 1700–1992". Journal of Geophysical Research 98 (A11): 18,895–18,906.
Kenneth, James P.; Kevin G. Cannariato, Ingrid L. Hendy, Richard J. Behl (2003-02-14). Methane Hydrates in Quaternary Climate Change: The Clathrate Gun Hypothesis. American Geophysical Union.
Keppler, Frank, Marc Brass, Jack Hamilton, Thomas Röckmann. "Global Warming - The Blame Is not with the Plants", Max Planck Society, 2006-01-18.
Kurzweil, Raymond (2006-07). "Nanotech Could Give Global Warming a Big Chill". Forbes / Wolfe Nanotech Report 5 (7).
Lean, Judith L.; Y.M. Wang, N.R. Sheeley (2002-12). "The effect of increasing solar activity on the Sun's total and open magnetic flux during multiple cycles: Implications for solar forcing of climate". Geophysical Research Letters 29 (24). DOI:10.1029/2002GL015880.
Lerner, K. Lee; Brenda Wilmoth Lerner (2006-07-26). Environmental issues : essential primary sources.. Thomson Gale. ISBN 1414406258.
McLaughlin, Joseph B.; Angelo DePaola, Cheryl A. Bopp, Karen A. Martinek, Nancy P. Napolilli, Christine G. Allison, Shelley L. Murray, Eric C. Thompson, Michele M. Bird, John P. Middaugh (2005-10-06). "Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters". New England Journal of Medicine 353 (14): 1463–1470. (online version requires registration)
Muscheler, Raimund; Fortunat Joos, Simon A. Müller, Ian Snowball (2005-07-28). "Climate: How unusual is today's solar activity?". Nature 436 (7012): 1084–1087. DOI:10.1038/nature04045.
Oerlemans, J. (2005-04-29). "Extracting a Climate Signal from 169 Glacier Records". Science 308 (5722): 675-677. DOI:10.1126/science.1107046.
Oreskes, Naomi (2004-12-03). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Science 306 (5702): 1686. DOI:10.1126/science.1103618.
Purse, Bethan V.; Philip S. Mellor, David J. Rogers, Alan R. Samuel, Peter P. C. Mertens, Matthew Baylis (2005-02). "Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in Europe". Nature Reviews Microbiology 3 (2): 171–181. DOI:10.1038/nrmicro1090.
Revkin, Andrew C. "Rise in Gases Unmatched by a History in Ancient Ice", The New York Times, 2005-11-05.
Ruddiman, William F. (2005-12-15). Earth's Climate Past and Future. New York: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-7167-3741-8.
Ruddiman, William F. (2005-08-01). Plows, Plagues, and Petroleum: How Humans Took Control of Climate. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12164-8.
Smith, Thomas M.; Richard W. Renolds (2005-06). "A Global Merged Land-Air-Sea Surface Temperature Reconstruction Based on Historical Observations (1880-1997)". Journal of Climate 18 (12): 2021–2036.
Solanki, Sami K.; I.G. Usoskin, B. Kromer, M. Schussler, J. Beer (2004-10-23). "Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years.". Nature 431: 1084–1087. DOI:10.1038/nature02995.
Solanki, Sami K.; I. G. Usoskin, B. Kromer, M. Schüssler, J. Beer (2005-07-28). "Climate: How unusual is today's solar activity? (Reply)". Nature 436: E4-E5. DOI:10.1038/nature04046.
Sowers, Todd (2006-02-10). "Late Quaternary Atmospheric CH4 Isotope Record Suggests Marine Clathrates Are Stable". Science 311 (5762): 838–840. DOI:10.1126/science.1121235.
Svensmark, Henrik; Jens Olaf P. Pedersen, Nigel D. Marsh, Martin B. Enghoff, Ulrik I. Uuggerhøj (2007-02-08). "Experimental evidence for the role of ions in particle nucleation under atmospheric conditions". Proceedings of the Royal Society A 463 (2078): 385-396. DOI:10.1098/rspa.2006.1773. (online version requires registration)
Climate risk to global economy. UNEP Financial Initiative (2002).
Walter, K. M.; S. A. Zimov, Jeff P. Chanton, D. Verbyla, F. S. Chapin (2006-09-07). "Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming". Nature 443 (7107): 71-75. DOI:10.1038/nature05040.
Wang, Y.-M.; J.L. Lean, N.R. Sheeley (2005-05-20). "Modeling the sun's magnetic field and irradiance since 1713". Astrophysical Journal 625: 522–538. DOI:10.1086/429689.